Total Disaster Programs in Utah, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,076
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Utah totaled $16,732,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castle Rock Land & Livestock | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $317,701 |
| 2 | Redd Summit Ranches LLC | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $182,528 |
| 3 | Gurney Cattle Company LLC | Aurora, UT 84620 | $171,400 |
| 4 | Bliss Honey LLC | Oak City, UT 84649 | $151,182 |
| 5 | Scott A Johnson | Monticello, UT 84535 | $148,835 |
| 6 | Rose Land And Cattle | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $145,450 |
| 7 | Box L Ranch LLC | Moroni, UT 84646 | $143,966 |
| 8 | Arimo Corporation | North Salt Lake, UT 84054 | $142,606 |
| 9 | Wintch Livestock Company | Manti, UT 84642 | $134,435 |
| 10 | Brb Livestock Co | Sandy, UT 84070 | $130,418 |
| 11 | Ty Cattle Company | Blanding, UT 84511 | $125,981 |
| 12 | Castle Valley Ranches LLC | Emery, UT 84522 | $125,000 |
| 13 | Robert A Barry | Monticello, UT 84535 | $122,896 |
| 14 | E Leon Mcelprang | Huntington, UT 84528 | $122,000 |
| 15 | Dennis J Richins | Henefer, UT 84033 | $117,875 |
| 16 | Lazy 3x Cattle, LLC | Mack, CO 81525 | $117,625 |
| 17 | Garn Farms | Fielding, UT 84311 | $113,223 |
| 18 | Heaton Livestock Co | Alton, UT 84710 | $109,779 |
| 19 | Wade Keven Jensen | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $106,686 |
| 20 | Kash D Winn | Ferron, UT 84523 | $104,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf