Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Utah County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Utah County, Utah totaled $326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bryce Clayton | St George, UT 84790 | $50,083 |
2 | Blue Horizons LLC | Sandy, UT 84093 | $40,666 |
3 | Steven Boyer Bearnson | Salem, UT 84653 | $36,121 |
4 | Bruce Hall | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $36,121 |
5 | J D Jackson | Provo, UT 84603 | $23,967 |
6 | Paul A Prior | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $16,533 |
7 | W M Ercanbrack Co Inc | Orem, UT 84058 | $14,714 |
8 | Ray Lynn Hurst | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $11,499 |
9 | Albert B Cornaby | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $11,142 |
10 | Jon C And Carol L Beck Family Tru | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $6,495 |
11 | Gary Hubbs | Fairview, UT 84629 | $5,928 |
12 | Ron Ash | Payson, UT 84651 | $5,685 |
13 | Mckinney Farms | American Fork, UT 84003 | $5,266 |
14 | Lloyd F Nilson | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $5,243 |
15 | Darren Baum | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $5,165 |
16 | Heber Lee Davis | Provo, UT 84601 | $4,977 |
17 | Tom Buckley | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $4,567 |
18 | John C Wollenzien | Payson, UT 84651 | $3,500 |
19 | Millerberg Enterprises | Sandy, UT 84070 | $3,500 |
20 | Boyde G Williams | American Fork, UT 84003 | $3,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>