Total Commodity Programs in Caroline County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 66
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Caroline County, Virginia totaled $1,299,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M S Terrell And Sons Inc | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $167,382 |
2 | Douglas Coleman Farms LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $101,402 |
3 | Earl W Beazley | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $83,119 |
4 | Mill Creek Farms LLC | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $81,624 |
5 | B A Tignor Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $55,872 |
6 | Smith Dairy Farm - Charity Hill Farm LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $45,745 |
7 | Douglas Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $42,067 |
8 | Terrell Grain LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $38,147 |
9 | Edwin T Upshaw III And Sons Farm | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $37,871 |
10 | Wayne Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $36,594 |
11 | Stuart T Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $35,975 |
12 | Francis M Barlow Jr | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $35,887 |
13 | Kathy Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $35,869 |
14 | Clarence W Tignor Jr Farms Inc | Milford, VA 22514 | $35,527 |
15 | Cory D Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $28,842 |
16 | Garland S Gravatt Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $28,727 |
17 | John Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $25,631 |
18 | Coleman Farm, LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $24,682 |
19 | Mike Broaddus | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $23,693 |
20 | D S Terrell Inc | Hanover, VA 23069 | $23,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>