Total Commodity Programs in King George County, Virginia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $688,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $279,107 |
2 | Tate And Tate Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $107,530 |
3 | River Farm Va LLC | King George, VA 22485 | $85,543 |
4 | Johan Lagerkvist | King George, VA 22485 | $39,407 |
5 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $31,336 |
6 | Wmm Farms Inc | King George, VA 22485 | $24,899 |
7 | Rodney D Rollins | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $21,357 |
8 | Mill Creek Farms LLC | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $12,958 |
9 | John Cleveland Owens | King George, VA 22485 | $12,676 |
10 | Robert Arthur Owens | Fredericksburg, VA 22408 | $12,423 |
11 | Agnes M Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $10,294 |
12 | Robert M Tremblay | King George, VA 22485 | $9,033 |
13 | Jane Mcdaniel | King George, VA 22485 | $5,559 |
14 | Charles L Henderson Farms LLC | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $4,673 |
15 | Lewis Alexander Ashton III | King George, VA 22485 | $4,348 |
16 | C Latane Bowie | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $4,135 |
17 | Betty J Frank | Jersey, VA 22481 | $3,232 |
18 | J C Owens Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $3,222 |
19 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $2,759 |
20 | James Pitts | King George, VA 22485 | $2,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>