Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in King William County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in King William County, Virginia totaled $484,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cohoke Farm LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $96,440 |
2 | Everett Pickett Upshaw | West Point, VA 23181 | $49,847 |
3 | Bryan Sutton Pearson | Hanover, VA 23069 | $37,231 |
4 | Erwin M Campbell | Manquin, VA 23106 | $33,750 |
5 | Guy David Chenault | Aylett, VA 23009 | $32,121 |
6 | Edmund S Simpson III | King William, VA 23086 | $25,519 |
7 | Riverside Farm Associates LLC | Manquin, VA 23106 | $23,830 |
8 | Thomas H Fox Jr | King William, VA 23086 | $20,158 |
9 | Piersa Farms Inc | West Point, VA 23181 | $19,949 |
10 | John M Kelley | King William, VA 23086 | $17,908 |
11 | Watkins Farm Inc | Manquin, VA 23106 | $17,462 |
12 | Linwood W Davenport Sr | Manquin, VA 23106 | $14,645 |
13 | Queenfield Farm | Manquin, VA 23106 | $12,319 |
14 | David L Johnson | West Point, VA 23181 | $10,407 |
15 | Wesley A Walker | King William, VA 23086 | $8,560 |
16 | Richard E Vaughan Jr | Hanover, VA 23069 | $8,338 |
17 | Edge Farm Lc | Aylett, VA 23009 | $8,245 |
18 | William Wayne Dabney | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $7,933 |
19 | Bent Creek Farms, Inc. | Aylett, VA 23009 | $4,351 |
20 | Sloe Grove Farm | Aylett, VA 23009 | $4,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>