Market Loss Assistance Program in Morgan County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 42
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Morgan County, West Virginia totaled $118,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Philip Harmison | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $26,753 |
2 | Friendship Farm | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $14,763 |
3 | Robert W Unger | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $10,818 |
4 | Barbara Lea Roach | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $9,656 |
5 | James R Michael | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $8,119 |
6 | Melinda B Golden | Hancock, MD 21750 | $8,068 |
7 | Kenneth E Michael | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $6,237 |
8 | Dan W Folk | Hedgesville, WV 25427 | $4,585 |
9 | Glascock Orchard Inc | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $4,512 |
10 | Pat Largent | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $3,222 |
11 | Benny M Smith | Hancock, MD 21750 | $2,415 |
12 | Stephen B Qualls | Winchester, VA 22601 | $2,262 |
13 | Paul W Largent | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $1,893 |
14 | Nelson Kesecker | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $1,779 |
15 | Raymond T Luttrell | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $1,769 |
16 | Edward J Earls | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $1,637 |
17 | Faye Copeland | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $1,246 |
18 | Donna J Swaim | Berkeley Springs, WV 25411 | $990 |
19 | Porterfield Orchards Inc | , 00000 | $903 |
20 | A Wallace Moore Jr | Bethesda, MD 20816 | $901 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>