Total Commodity Programs in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 525
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $9,430,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $181,969 |
| 2 | Arrowhead Farms Partnership | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $175,559 |
| 3 | Solberg Dairy Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $175,389 |
| 4 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $171,305 |
| 5 | Hilger Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $160,330 |
| 6 | Lagesse Dairy Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $154,058 |
| 7 | Kenealy Dairy Farms | Cadott, WI 54727 | $148,861 |
| 8 | Triple T Farms LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $146,288 |
| 9 | Mahr Brothers LLC | Stanley, WI 54768 | $146,111 |
| 10 | Dribble Ridge Dairy | Colfax, WI 54730 | $145,536 |
| 11 | Douglas T Danielson | Cadott, WI 54727 | $143,866 |
| 12 | Lnb Farms LLC | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $142,546 |
| 13 | Backhaus Acres LLC | Boyd, WI 54726 | $139,976 |
| 14 | Ksm Farms LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $139,825 |
| 15 | Daniel M Holub | Boyd, WI 54726 | $136,278 |
| 16 | Dd Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $133,103 |
| 17 | Solhawk Dairy Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $127,534 |
| 18 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $126,368 |
| 19 | Peck Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $118,432 |
| 20 | Len-don Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $116,101 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf