Dairy Programs in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 65
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $2,010,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kd Partners Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $121,548 |
| 2 | Brandes Farms Limited Partnership | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $120,598 |
| 3 | Achenbach's Hy View Farms Limited Partnership | Eastman, WI 54626 | $119,006 |
| 4 | Fritsche Farms LLC | Steuben, WI 54657 | $113,008 |
| 5 | Crestview Acres LLC | Eastman, WI 54626 | $100,906 |
| 6 | Jelinek Farms LLC | Eastman, WI 54626 | $97,486 |
| 7 | Nolan Farms Limited Partnership | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $94,931 |
| 8 | Hartley Brothers Partnership | Eastman, WI 54626 | $94,005 |
| 9 | James R Hagensick | Eastman, WI 54626 | $80,353 |
| 10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $75,792 |
| 11 | Glasbrenner Farms LLC | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $72,056 |
| 12 | Thomas C Kearns | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $62,933 |
| 13 | Kathy Flansburgh | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $58,679 |
| 14 | Denmar Ridge Farms LLC | Steuben, WI 54657 | $51,499 |
| 15 | Wedeberg Farms Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $40,586 |
| 16 | Donald J Boland | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $36,421 |
| 17 | Hill N Vale Acres Inc | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $33,039 |
| 18 | James A Moret | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $32,636 |
| 19 | Harvest Hills Farms LLC | Eastman, WI 54626 | $32,210 |
| 20 | Alan J Hromadka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $31,707 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf