Production Flexibility Program in Jackson County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 725
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Jackson County, Wisconsin totaled $7,894,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jerome J Laufenberg Inc | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $281,923 |
| 2 | Heller Farm Inc | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $272,685 |
| 3 | Sedelbauer Farms Inc | Hixton, WI 54635 | $232,464 |
| 4 | Robert E Rowekamp | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $206,887 |
| 5 | Freise Farms Inc | Melrose, WI 54642 | $178,274 |
| 6 | Stetzer Farms | Melrose, WI 54642 | $167,872 |
| 7 | Chester D Reichert | Holmen, WI 54636 | $150,686 |
| 8 | William John Laufenberg | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $116,344 |
| 9 | Emil J Giese | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $101,776 |
| 10 | James N Halik | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $92,464 |
| 11 | C P Anton Pin | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $86,292 |
| 12 | Triple Mound Inc | Niceville, FL 32578 | $84,472 |
| 13 | Prindle Farms Inc | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $77,032 |
| 14 | Kling Cedar Lane Farms Inc | Taylor, WI 54659 | $76,558 |
| 15 | Gearing Livestock Farms | Hixton, WI 54635 | $75,160 |
| 16 | Blaken Farms LLC | Melrose, WI 54642 | $74,894 |
| 17 | Kunes Farms | Melrose, WI 54642 | $72,706 |
| 18 | Fredrickson Farms Inc | Taylor, WI 54659 | $69,440 |
| 19 | D & D Trust | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $61,854 |
| 20 | James E Prindle | Merrillan, WI 54754 | $61,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf