Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Monroe County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 554
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Monroe County, Wisconsin totaled $8,601,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mlsna Dairy Supply Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $348,131 |
2 | Habelman Bros Co | Tomah, WI 54660 | $250,000 |
3 | Chapman Farms Dairy LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $201,224 |
4 | Valley Corp | Tomah, WI 54660 | $166,654 |
5 | Gregory E Selbrede | Sparta, WI 54656 | $161,995 |
6 | Darrick T Johnson | Tomah, WI 54660 | $136,602 |
7 | Dean L Wegner | Sparta, WI 54656 | $134,299 |
8 | North Tomah Cranberry Co Inc | Tomah, WI 54660 | $116,150 |
9 | Herricks Dairy Farm Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $108,359 |
10 | Wildcat Bluff Cranberry Company L | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $103,752 |
11 | Prehn Cranberry Co | Wausau, WI 54403 | $100,874 |
12 | Michael J Linnehan | Sparta, WI 54656 | $95,552 |
13 | Jensen Cranberry Bogs Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $93,092 |
14 | Douglas A Fries | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $84,207 |
15 | Mapltwin Farms LLC | Cashton, WI 54619 | $80,164 |
16 | James Potter Cranberry Marsh Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $79,305 |
17 | Spring Valley Holsteins Inc | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $76,668 |
18 | Jessie Farms Inc | Sparta, WI 54656 | $76,421 |
19 | Brueggen Dairy Farm Inc | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $75,116 |
20 | Jay Creek Cranberries Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $73,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>