Counter Cyclical Program in Oconto County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 847
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Oconto County, Wisconsin totaled $3,493,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hodkiewicz Harvesting & Trucking LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $74,244 |
| 2 | Jagiello Farms & Trucking LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $73,674 |
| 3 | Jagiello Dairy Farms LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $65,154 |
| 4 | Zahn's Farms LLC | Gillett, WI 54124 | $64,522 |
| 5 | Paul Madson Custom Farming LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $57,322 |
| 6 | Gerndt Farms | Suring, WI 54174 | $52,525 |
| 7 | Pagel Dairy Farms Inc | Lena, WI 54139 | $45,412 |
| 8 | Stoll Brothers Farms | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $45,142 |
| 9 | Nerfarms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $37,478 |
| 10 | O'harrow's Inc | Oconto Falls, WI 54154 | $36,747 |
| 11 | Brian Watts Inc | Oconto, WI 54153 | $36,238 |
| 12 | Luther Farms LLC | Gillett, WI 54124 | $33,291 |
| 13 | Peters Grain Farms LLC | Oconto, WI 54153 | $32,203 |
| 14 | Daniel Gene Gardebrecht | Suring, WI 54174 | $31,167 |
| 15 | John Rybicki Jr | Krakow, WI 54137 | $28,152 |
| 16 | D And K Farms Inc | Little Suamico, WI 54141 | $27,598 |
| 17 | James Bernard Mahoney | Suring, WI 54174 | $27,304 |
| 18 | James Le Mere | Oconto, WI 54153 | $26,643 |
| 19 | Sievert Dairy Farms | Sobieski, WI 54171 | $25,762 |
| 20 | Thomas Gilles | Lena, WI 54139 | $25,704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf