Emergency Conservation Program in Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,597
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $10,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Western Hay Farm Corp | Cabo Rojo, PR 00623 | $139,776 |
2 | Juan Pagan Caraballo | Yauco, PR 00698 | $122,887 |
3 | Empresas Agricolas Rucajoan Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $82,236 |
4 | Luis G Pena-santiago | Juana Diaz, PR 00795 | $72,176 |
5 | Rosa M Garcia Candelaria | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $70,385 |
6 | Finca Encarnacion Inc | Lajas, PR 00667 | $64,692 |
7 | Josue Pinto Inc | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $60,260 |
8 | Hacienda Rosa Ana Inc | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $56,816 |
9 | Wenwalmar Inc | Ponce, PR 00732 | $56,472 |
10 | Finca El Paraiso Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $55,050 |
11 | Carlos Morales Tirado | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $54,011 |
12 | Rico Banana Inc | Cayey, PR 00736 | $53,576 |
13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $50,417 |
14 | Hector N Ramos Davila | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $49,520 |
15 | Roberto Arroyo Torres | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $48,866 |
16 | , | $48,462 | |
17 | Milton Torres Martinez | Lajas, PR 00667 | $47,415 |
18 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $47,283 |
19 | Hacienda El Platanal Inc | Aguada, PR 00602 | $46,800 |
20 | Jose A A Acevedo Perez | Moca, PR 00676 | $44,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>