Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,767

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby) totaled $222,764,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
1Ameris Bank **Dothan, AL 36303$6,323,148
2Shipes FarmsHeadland, AL 36345$2,649,187
3D C FarmsSamson, AL 36477$2,642,331
4Friend Bank **Slocomb, AL 36375$2,268,476
5Pitchford FarmsColumbia, AL 36319$2,046,351
6Sumblin FarmKinston, AL 36453$1,888,489
7George Jeffcoat Farms-03Gordon, AL 36343$1,846,933
8James C And Mary J Parker FarmsHeadland, AL 36345$1,597,908
9Hayes FarmsHeadland, AL 36345$1,584,027
10Alabama Ag Credit Aca **Monroeville, AL 36461$1,550,744
11Bristow Farms PartnershipColumbia, AL 36319$1,430,136
12Thomas Kirkland FarmHeadland, AL 36345$1,403,495
13Five Points Farming PartnershipCoffee Springs, AL 36318$1,370,053
14Adams Farms PartnershipNewville, AL 36353$1,325,431
15Holloman FarmColumbia, AL 36319$1,312,728
16Chris Thompson Farms GpMidland City, AL 36350$1,181,265
17Averett Farm PartnershipChancellor, AL 36316$1,149,548
18Djl CompanyHeadland, AL 36345$1,134,447
19First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$1,096,968
20Americana Community Bank **Dothan, AL 36301$976,011

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag