Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 5th District of Alabama (Rep. Mo Brooks), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 789
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 5th District of Alabama (Rep. Mo Brooks) totaled $6,389,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Newby Farms | Athens, AL 35613 | $327,901 |
2 | Haney Farms | Athens, AL 35611 | $310,756 |
3 | Darden Bridgeforth And Sons | Tanner, AL 35671 | $240,488 |
4 | Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $199,806 |
5 | Chris Williamson | Athens, AL 35611 | $153,856 |
6 | Vaden Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $127,050 |
7 | Henderson Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $122,517 |
8 | Mcnatt Farms | Elkmont, AL 35620 | $119,637 |
9 | John Walton Anderson Jr | Athens, AL 35613 | $102,066 |
10 | James H Walker | Florence, AL 35633 | $95,250 |
11 | Gary And Dustin Peek Farms Pship | Athens, AL 35614 | $91,711 |
12 | Haddock Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $82,603 |
13 | Keith C Harbin | Athens, AL 35614 | $77,794 |
14 | Williams Cotton Farms | Lexington, AL 35648 | $73,535 |
15 | D & C Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $68,527 |
16 | Thomas D Ray | Waterloo, AL 35677 | $63,343 |
17 | Hobbs Farms | Elkmont, AL 35620 | $61,742 |
18 | Greg Weatherford | Lester, AL 35647 | $55,141 |
19 | Mitchell & Spry Enterprises LLC | Florence, AL 35633 | $49,483 |
20 | Shaw Farms | Tanner, AL 35671 | $46,660 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>