Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 77
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $1,055,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | The Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $82,198 |
2 | Cushman Farms Lp | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $81,900 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $69,863 |
4 | Graywall Farms LLC | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $67,318 |
5 | Spielman Farm LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $55,837 |
6 | Beriah Lewis Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $49,036 |
7 | Shawn Mcgillicuddy Dba Square A Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $48,635 |
8 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $43,947 |
9 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $41,466 |
10 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $40,041 |
11 | Tyler Brothers | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $36,994 |
12 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $35,901 |
13 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $34,104 |
14 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $28,740 |
15 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $26,069 |
16 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $23,478 |
17 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $21,709 |
18 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $19,938 |
19 | Clark W Woodmansee III | Preston, CT 06365 | $19,251 |
20 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $17,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>