Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 507

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn) totaled $11,334,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Vanlandingham Farms IncQuincy, FL 32351$500,000
2Triple L Cattle Company LLCMayo, FL 32066$490,985
3White Oak Dairy IncMayo, FL 32066$457,460
4Sunblest Gardens LLCCrawfordville, FL 32327$286,712
5Raymon J Land JrBranford, FL 32008$250,000
6North American Farms IncBascom, FL 32423$250,000
7Oglesby Plants International, IncAltha, FL 32421$250,000
8Todd ShelleyGreenwood, FL 32443$230,364
9F-n-r Farms PartnershipBrinson, GA 39825$198,415
10Kelby SanchezOld Town, FL 32680$173,832
11Sanchez FarmsOld Town, FL 32680$173,587
12Veit Farms, LLCChipley, FL 32428$163,900
13James Michael WilliamsMalone, FL 32445$163,014
14Herman H Sanchez IIIOld Town, FL 32680$159,338
15City Greens Farm LLCCottondale, FL 32431$155,912
16Janna Leigh PeacockMarianna, FL 32448$154,126
17John Mark PeacockMarianna, FL 32448$134,023
18Fred Jay JacksonGrand Ridge, FL 32442$132,429
19Naveen RanaCross City, FL 32628$128,881
20Southeastern Shade, IncMayo, FL 32066$126,656

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag