Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 847

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $14,119,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Ponoholo Ranch LtdKamuela, HI 96743$284,405
2Howards Nurseries IncKula, HI 96790$250,000
3Purdyco Ltd Dba Island PrincessHonolulu, HI 96819$250,000
4Kawamata Farms LLCKamuela, HI 96743$250,000
5Pacific Produce IncKula, HI 96790$231,354
6Green Point Nurseries IncHilo, HI 96720$221,110
7Island Harvest IncKapaau, HI 96755$209,317
8Tai Wan GuPepeekeo, HI 96783$206,055
9Hilo Orchid Farm Hawaii IncMountain View, HI 96771$191,675
10Kuahiwi Contractors IncNaalehu, HI 96772$190,952
11Smart Direct,llcHilo, HI 96720$177,382
12Kula Country Farms LLCKula, HI 96790$172,753
13Healing Noni Co. LLCHilo, HI 96720$163,884
14Hawaii Island Honey Co LLCHilo, HI 96721$155,164
15Newman's Nursery, IncKeaau, HI 96749$147,719
16Kohala Nursery IncKapaau, HI 96755$146,890
17Novelty Greens LLCHilo, HI 96720$145,568
18Kahua Ranch LimitedKamuela, HI 96743$143,729
19Hawaii Fresh Produce Company IncPepeekeo, HI 96783$131,960
20Hirako Farms IncKamuela, HI 96743$127,701

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag