Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,738

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $66,804,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Grandview Farms IncEldridge, IA 52748$750,000
2Wapsie Feeders LLCMuscatine, IA 52761$671,655
3Double L Cattle LLCDurant, IA 52747$578,119
4Merit Swine IncFarmington, IA 52626$500,000
5Iowa Family FarmsBatavia, IA 52533$492,843
6Summit Ag Group LLCDavenport, IA 52807$481,288
7Paustian Enterprise LtdWalcott, IA 52773$480,132
8Kirby Farms IncDavenport, IA 52807$478,336
9Tri Oak Foods Inc-oakville Ia &wh&Oakville, IA 52646$375,000
10Hooter Lane Farms IncLockridge, IA 52635$370,741
11Lanz Pork IncOakville, IA 52646$307,045
12Pork 360 East IncMuscatine, IA 52761$298,023
13D & M Wagner IncMuscatine, IA 52761$250,000
14Chris PettyLeon, IA 50144$250,000
15Jonas M YoderLeon, IA 50144$250,000
16Harrisburg Iso Pig CompanySaint Paul, IA 52657$250,000
17Steve BreitsprecherBloomfield, IA 52537$250,000
18Curtis Matthew VandenbergheStockton, IA 52769$250,000
19Deer Run Pork LcSpirit Lake, IA 51360$250,000
20Central States Cattle Co.Albia, IA 52531$250,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag