Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack), 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,112
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Iowa (Rep. David Loebsack) totaled $112,706,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple A Family Farms General Partnership | Batavia, IA 52533 | $687,414 |
2 | Iowa Family Farms | Batavia, IA 52533 | $675,314 |
3 | Gabeline Family Farms | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $485,456 |
4 | Bobkat Acres | Mechanicsville, IA 52306 | $484,911 |
5 | Dale W Auwaerter | Montrose, IA 52639 | $445,716 |
6 | Brader Brothers | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $386,166 |
7 | Porter Farms | Mercer, MO 64661 | $383,098 |
8 | Grandview Farms Inc | Eldridge, IA 52748 | $365,124 |
9 | Wapsie Feeders LLC | Muscatine, IA 52761 | $365,036 |
10 | Jerrie Everett Fetters | Seymour, IA 52590 | $322,836 |
11 | Lehman Family Farms Inc. | New London, IA 52645 | $305,934 |
12 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $287,657 |
13 | Abel Brothers Partnership | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $284,563 |
14 | David Michael Spurgin | Moravia, IA 52571 | $271,631 |
15 | Merit Swine Inc | Farmington, IA 52626 | $268,043 |
16 | Lawless Farms | Albia, IA 52531 | $266,949 |
17 | Koberg Bros Partnership | Walcott, IA 52773 | $257,329 |
18 | Blackhawk Farms | Richland, IA 52585 | $256,807 |
19 | Leon Paul Peterson | Winfield, IA 52659 | $254,818 |
20 | Curtis J Richers | Wever, IA 52658 | $253,549 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>