Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,215

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $747,340,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
1Shoshone Bannock TribeFort Hall, ID 83203$20,686,415
2Spratling FarmsBurley, ID 83318$5,395,837
3Nelson 7ud RanchesRockland, ID 83271$5,014,306
4Evans Brothers FarmArbon, ID 83212$4,538,385
5Cold Springs Farm PartnershipNewton, UT 84327$3,745,897
6Harris AgMalta, ID 83342$3,193,418
7Hartvigsen BrothersCenterville, UT 84014$3,187,469
8Cardene EnterprisesBrigham City, UT 84302$2,934,921
9Simmons Brothers PartnersIdaho Falls, ID 83401$2,736,309
10Thompson Farms PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$2,725,417
11Ward FarmsArbon, ID 83212$2,568,147
12J D Woodard & Sons PtrIdaho Falls, ID 83404$2,486,623
13Woodworth PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$2,355,831
14Nebeker BrosSalt Lake City, UT 84108$2,148,022
15Koompin FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$2,108,062
16Black Rock PartnershipRirie, ID 83443$1,982,447
17B & R FarmsMesquite, NV 89027$1,930,388
18Burning Butterfly PartnershipBoise, ID 83702$1,869,620
19Lazy Dj PartnershipBurley, ID 83318$1,828,062
20Hamilton Triple C FarmsRirie, ID 83443$1,745,713

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag