Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,406

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Idaho (Rep. Michael Simpson) totaled $270,753,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
1Idaho Agcredit Pca **American Falls, ID 83211$3,550,023
2Cranney BrothersOakley, ID 83346$2,490,115
3Driscoll BrothersPocatello, ID 83201$2,459,208
4Gehring Agri-businessAmerican Falls, ID 83211$2,308,372
5Golden Ridge FarmsJackson, ID 83350$2,269,421
6Skyline FarmsSaint Anthony, ID 83445$1,468,355
7Koompin FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,404,149
8Vo Enterprises PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$1,337,187
9Ward FarmsArbon, ID 83212$1,324,283
10Lance & Lisa Funk Partnership Dba Lance Funk FarmsAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,264,496
11Monty & Carolene Funk PartnershipAmerican Falls, ID 83211$1,261,341
12Behrend Behrend & Knittel FarmsAberdeen, ID 83210$1,253,123
13Thompson Farms PartnershipPingree, ID 83262$1,251,996
14Bj Christensen & SonsBlackfoot, ID 83221$1,240,662
15Wtr Martin Farms PartnershipBlackfoot, ID 83221$1,184,861
16Kim Wahlen Farms GpAberdeen, ID 83210$1,165,248
17Rising River EnterprisesBlackfoot, ID 83221$1,158,739
18David & Magdalene SauerMonteview, ID 83435$1,071,148
19Polatis Brothers FarmsBlackfoot, ID 83221$1,061,224
20West Side General PtrshpMonteview, ID 83435$1,020,425

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag