Total Commodity Programs in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,233
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 12th District of Illinois (Rep. Mike Bost) totaled $14,250,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cedar Ridge Primary Spf Inc | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $943,272 |
| 2 | Westridge Dairy LLC | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $513,818 |
| 3 | Stumpf Pork, Inc | Columbia, IL 62236 | $333,861 |
| 4 | Stumpf Brothers Farms LLC | Columbia, IL 62236 | $256,395 |
| 5 | David E Reinhardt | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $245,888 |
| 6 | Gjs Farms | Columbia, IL 62236 | $227,716 |
| 7 | Myron A Rapp Trust | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $227,713 |
| 8 | Thor Lohrberg | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $221,441 |
| 9 | Wittenauer Farms LLC | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $155,045 |
| 10 | Kenneth R Hartman Jr | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $141,471 |
| 11 | Glendell H Farms Ltd | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $135,892 |
| 12 | Steve A Williams | Tamms, IL 62988 | $135,557 |
| 13 | Krueger Farms | Columbia, IL 62236 | $134,468 |
| 14 | Martha L Poetker LLC | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $126,419 |
| 15 | George W Obernagel III | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $122,969 |
| 16 | William E Mcclarney | Thebes, IL 62990 | $120,566 |
| 17 | William Riechmann | Valmeyer, IL 62295 | $119,390 |
| 18 | Maurice Kruse | Waterloo, IL 62298 | $119,324 |
| 19 | Stadter Bros | Red Bud, IL 62278 | $114,637 |
| 20 | Seboldt Brothers | Fults, IL 62244 | $114,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf