Total Conservation Programs in 9th District of Indiana (Rep. Trey Hollingsworth), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 247
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 9th District of Indiana (Rep. Trey Hollingsworth) totaled $591,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Olive D Sweeney | Salem, IN 47167 | $30,747 |
2 | Shelley J Seifert | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $24,365 |
3 | John R Seifert | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $24,365 |
4 | Isabelle Buehl | Bargersville, IN 46106 | $22,077 |
5 | Camaguey, Inc. | Bellefontaine, OH 43311 | $19,880 |
6 | Big John Farms LLC | Depauw, IN 47115 | $18,228 |
7 | Merwyn T & Darlene C Fisher Revocable Trust | Pekin, IN 47165 | $17,226 |
8 | Chris Boucher | Hardinsburg, IN 47125 | $15,410 |
9 | John M Bush | Fredericksburg, IN 47120 | $12,932 |
10 | Bodenbender Farms LLC | Fredericksburg, IN 47120 | $12,615 |
11 | Ohio River Veneer LLC | Bloomington, IN 47401 | $12,268 |
12 | Betty Bickel | Corydon, IN 47112 | $11,835 |
13 | William H Schoen | Elizabeth, IN 47117 | $10,032 |
14 | County Line Inc | Orleans, IN 47452 | $9,789 |
15 | Cary Schooley | Georgetown, IN 47122 | $9,674 |
16 | Jerry E & Judy A Myers Revocable Trust | Campbellsburg, IN 47108 | $8,294 |
17 | Gregory Wynn Jones | Laconia, IN 47135 | $7,649 |
18 | William J Smith | Pekin, IN 47165 | $7,394 |
19 | Brad J Myers | Scottsburg, IN 47170 | $7,219 |
20 | Benjamin B Marrs | Fredericksburg, IN 47120 | $6,876 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>