Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 13,050

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $249,687,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Brookover Land Ent LpGarden City, KS 67846$750,000
2Fairleigh RanchScott City, KS 67871$750,000
3Premium FeedersScandia, KS 66966$750,000
4Stabel Family Comp LLCLakin, KS 67860$750,000
5Reeve Cattle Entities LLCGarden City, KS 67846$735,830
6Innovative Livestock ServicesGreat Bend, KS 67530$657,143
7R & P Cattle JvCimarron, KS 67835$655,062
8Poky Feeders IncScott City, KS 67871$638,385
9Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$614,494
10Meyer Land And Cattle CoSylvan Grove, KS 67481$610,010
11Doll PartnershipIngalls, KS 67853$600,000
12Smith Brothers Feeders LLCRichfield, KS 67953$594,985
13Clawson Ranch PartnershipPlains, KS 67869$589,478
14Syracuse Dairy LLCSyracuse, KS 67878$573,350
15Lakin Dairy LlpLakin, KS 67860$566,339
16Henry Pork, LLCLongford, KS 67458$548,533
17Cow Camp IncRamona, KS 67475$541,387
18Celtic LLCTribune, KS 67879$525,000
19Hilker Family Limited PartnershipCimarron, KS 67835$505,647
20Doll Land And Cattle IncIngalls, KS 67853$500,000

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag