Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33,163
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Kansas (Rep. Roger Marshall) totaled $353,679,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alfalfa Farms | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $769,491 |
| 2 | Homestead Farms | Wallace, KS 67761 | $651,774 |
| 3 | Powerline Dairy LLC | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $617,080 |
| 4 | Bankwest ** | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $580,455 |
| 5 | Quad K Farms | Herndon, KS 67739 | $572,813 |
| 6 | The Bank ** | Winona, KS 67764 | $559,819 |
| 7 | J & A Partnership, Gp | Garden City, KS 67846 | $521,599 |
| 8 | Tim Dewey Farms | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $491,994 |
| 9 | Reeve Cattle Entities LLC | Garden City, KS 67846 | $485,830 |
| 10 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $482,695 |
| 11 | Double Diamond Ag | Johnson, KS 67855 | $453,977 |
| 12 | Cott Family Farms | Clay Center, KS 67432 | $419,399 |
| 13 | Spring Creek Family Farms | Wamego, KS 66547 | $402,897 |
| 14 | Royal Farms Dairy LLC | Garden City, KS 67846 | $388,260 |
| 15 | F & J Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $384,206 |
| 16 | J D M Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $380,742 |
| 17 | Irsik Family Partnership | Garden City, KS 67846 | $360,747 |
| 18 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $347,079 |
| 19 | J7 Dairy LLC | Tribune, KS 67879 | $337,109 |
| 20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $331,656 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf