Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 159

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating) totaled $2,858,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Cape Cod Oyster Co IncMarstons Mills, MA 02648$248,264
2Bartletts Ocean View Farm IncNantucket, MA 02554$213,495
3Aquacultural Research CorpDennis, MA 02638$145,910
4Morning Glory Farm, Inc.Edgartown, MA 02539$119,795
5Cotuit Oyster Company IncCotuit, MA 02635$106,386
6Saunier's Heather Gardens, Inc.Vineyard Haven, MA 02568$93,157
7Sandy Neck Oyster CompanyWest Barnstable, MA 02668$85,937
8Vineyard GardensWest Tisbury, MA 02575$81,646
9Ward Aquafarms LLCNorth Falmouth, MA 02556$72,753
10Wayne R HayesHyannis, MA 02601$63,004
11Chatham Shellfish CoWest Chatham, MA 02669$51,915
12Holbrook Oyster Ranch, Inc.Wellfleet, MA 02667$47,319
13Signature Oyster LLCEdgartown, MA 02539$44,996
14Avery Oyster Company IncWellfleet, MA 02667$44,643
15William RichardsonOrleans, MA 02653$44,200
16Big Rock Oyster Company, Inc.Harwich, MA 02645$43,825
17Handy Cranberry TrustPocasset, MA 02559$42,486
18Northern Collective IncWellfleet, MA 02667$42,208
19Patrick WinslowWellfleet, MA 02667$42,072
20Peter OrcuttOrleans, MA 02653$40,486

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag