Farm Subsidy information
9th District of Massachusetts
(Rep. Bill Keating)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating) totaled $287,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aquacultural Research Corp | Dennis, MA 02638 | $145,910 |
| 2 | Holbrook Oyster Ranch, Inc. | Wellfleet, MA 02667 | $23,954 |
| 3 | Three Seas Fisheries Inc | North Truro, MA 02652 | $14,832 |
| 4 | Great Island Oyster Co LLC | Chatham, MA 02633 | $14,011 |
| 5 | Scott Macallister | Orleans, MA 02653 | $13,465 |
| 6 | Island Grown Initiative | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $10,816 |
| 7 | Robert Wallace | South Wellfleet, MA 02663 | $10,811 |
| 8 | Alexander Lalone | South Wellfleet, MA 02663 | $6,432 |
| 9 | Peter Orcutt | Orleans, MA 02653 | $6,315 |
| 10 | Mvm Edibles LLC | Edgartown, MA 02539 | $5,721 |
| 11 | Handy Cranberry Trust | Pocasset, MA 02559 | $5,373 |
| 12 | Randy Williams | Wellfleet, MA 02667 | $3,710 |
| 13 | Lisa Dexter | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $3,484 |
| 14 | David Flattery | Provincetown, MA 02657 | $3,071 |
| 15 | Chester Halunen | West Wareham, MA 02576 | $2,909 |
| 16 | Allen Farm Inc | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $2,346 |
| 17 | John S Stephens | Vineyard Haven, MA 02568 | $2,197 |
| 18 | Grey Barn Farm Enterprises LLC | Chilmark, MA 02535 | $2,151 |
| 19 | Ethan D Estey | South Wellfleet, MA 02663 | $1,365 |
| 20 | John M Alden | Cataumet, MA 02534 | $1,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf