Total Commodity Programs in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating), 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 274

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 9th District of Massachusetts (Rep. Bill Keating) totaled $4,537,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2020
1Michael J ReardonE Falmouth, MA 02536$250,000
2Cape Cod Oyster Co IncMarstons Mills, MA 02648$248,264
3Bartletts Ocean View Farm IncNantucket, MA 02554$213,995
4Brown Fishing Company Inc.North Falmouth, MA 02556$196,904
5Morning Glory Farm, Inc.Edgartown, MA 02539$119,795
6Cotuit Oyster Company IncCotuit, MA 02635$106,386
7Saunier's Heather Gardens, Inc.Vineyard Haven, MA 02568$92,396
8Vineyard GardensWest Tisbury, MA 02575$81,646
9Sandy Neck Oyster CompanyWest Barnstable, MA 02668$74,728
10Handy Cranberry TrustPocasset, MA 02559$66,357
11Ward Aquafarms LLCNorth Falmouth, MA 02556$63,264
12Wayne R HayesHyannis, MA 02601$63,004
13Calico Lobster Co., Inc.Sandwich, MA 02563$57,706
14Chatham Shellfish CoWest Chatham, MA 02669$51,915
15Signature Oyster LLCEdgartown, MA 02539$44,996
16Avery Oyster Company IncWellfleet, MA 02667$44,643
17William RichardsonOrleans, MA 02653$44,200
18Big Rock Oyster Company, Inc.Harwich, MA 02645$43,825
19Nantucket Sound Fish Weirs IncOrleans, MA 02653$43,558
20Northern Collective IncWellfleet, MA 02667$42,208

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag