Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Maryland (Rep. Steny Hoyer), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 243
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Maryland (Rep. Steny Hoyer) totaled $1,310,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bowles Farms LLC | Loveville, MD 20656 | $122,008 |
2 | Harold B Garner Jr | Welcome, MD 20693 | $69,484 |
3 | Helena Agri-enterprises LLC | West Columbia, SC 29170 | $64,707 |
4 | Joseph W Vallandingham Jr | Clements, MD 20624 | $57,169 |
5 | True Chesapeake Oyster Company LLC | Baltimore, MD 21211 | $44,529 |
6 | H & S Farms LLC | Hughesville, MD 20637 | $35,828 |
7 | Friendly Hall Farm, LLC | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $32,875 |
8 | Russell Bros LLC | Morganza, MD 20660 | $31,826 |
9 | Raley Farms Inc | Mechanicsville, MD 20659 | $31,644 |
10 | Raymond M Norris | California, MD 20619 | $30,985 |
11 | James Michael Norris | California, MD 20619 | $30,985 |
12 | Hollywood Oyster Company | Hollywood, MD 20636 | $30,767 |
13 | Bowling Agri Services | Newburg, MD 20664 | $27,671 |
14 | Hancock Ag LLC | La Plata, MD 20646 | $24,355 |
15 | Mallows Farms LLC | La Plata, MD 20646 | $24,347 |
16 | Thomas D Briscoe | Saint Leonard, MD 20685 | $19,563 |
17 | James Elmer Hill Jr | Waldorf, MD 20601 | $19,029 |
18 | Stanley J Boothe | Valley Lee, MD 20692 | $18,693 |
19 | James M Bowles | Leonardtown, MD 20650 | $17,720 |
20 | Malcolm E Goode Jr | Maddox, MD 20621 | $17,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>