Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,080

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) totaled $30,081,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$1,017,658
2Bischer Farms PartnershipRuth, MI 48470$973,849
3Palms Boys LLCPalms, MI 48465$750,000
4Te Voortwis Dairy LLCBad Axe, MI 48413$750,000
5Highland Dairy LLCSebewaing, MI 48759$750,000
6Aquila Farms LLCBad Axe, MI 48413$750,000
7W.a. Herford & Sons Farms, Inc.Elkton, MI 48731$662,116
8Wil Le Farms IncBad Axe, MI 48413$627,783
9Dekker Dairy Farms LLCUbly, MI 48475$526,769
10Nelson L WeaverSandusky, MI 48471$500,000
11Rathmourne Dairy LLCPort Hope, MI 48468$500,000
12Bayside Livestock L L CSebewaing, MI 48759$500,000
13Jahn Farms LLCPort Hope, MI 48468$500,000
14Trost Farms IncPigeon, MI 48755$481,141
15Mc Of Mc IncMinden City, MI 48456$446,119
16Oak River Dairy LLCSebewaing, MI 48759$334,249
17Roundtree Dairy LLCPigeon, MI 48755$281,465
18Thuemmel Dairy IncPort Austin, MI 48467$272,746
19Sharrard Farms LLCPeck, MI 48466$271,162
20D & P Dairy LLCMarlette, MI 48453$262,374

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag