Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 7th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin Peterson) totaled $1,589,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Reece Farms Inc. | Farwell, MN 56327 | $319,183 |
2 | Reece Industries Inc. | Lowry, MN 56349 | $319,182 |
3 | Keith Budke | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $145,781 |
4 | Larry Jagol | Fertile, MN 56540 | $121,883 |
5 | Wilmer Farms Inc | Warroad, MN 56763 | $96,654 |
6 | Ocdar Industries, LLC | East Gull Lake, MN 56401 | $92,438 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $75,170 |
8 | Bradley Jagol | Fertile, MN 56540 | $72,276 |
9 | Old Mill Honey LLC | Barrett, MN 56311 | $68,161 |
10 | Leiting Honey Inc. | Fertile, MN 56540 | $51,548 |
11 | Bird And The Bees Honey LLC | Iola, WI 54945 | $40,710 |
12 | Lee Braaten | Glenwood, MN 56334 | $32,259 |
13 | Alan D Braaten | Glenwood, MN 56334 | $32,259 |
14 | Craig D Weber | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $32,038 |
15 | Woodside Honey LLC | Erskine, MN 56535 | $26,939 |
16 | Sonja B Hanson | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $25,619 |
17 | Glenn A Struthers | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $11,878 |
18 | Ronald J Koopman | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $7,167 |
19 | Fredrick W Ehlers | Leonard, MN 56652 | $3,763 |
20 | Robin M Sik | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $3,097 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>