Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 809
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 8th District of Missouri (Rep. Jason Smith) totaled $614,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wyatt Cole Mayberry | Essex, MO 63846 | $46,165 |
2 | Jbs Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $34,226 |
3 | Brazel Land & Timber LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $29,608 |
4 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $28,006 |
5 | Gfg Ag Finance LLC ** | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $19,264 |
6 | Fox Meadows Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $18,630 |
7 | Noel Farms LLC | Champaign, IL 61820 | $18,598 |
8 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $17,990 |
9 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $15,550 |
10 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $14,660 |
11 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $11,165 |
12 | David C Johnson | Whitewater, MO 63785 | $10,872 |
13 | Point Pleasant Farm Co LLC | Hayti, MO 63851 | $9,896 |
14 | Ted Gremaud | Perryville, MO 63775 | $9,676 |
15 | Ridgetop Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $9,590 |
16 | Larry Allred | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $9,276 |
17 | Morehouse Cbm Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $9,004 |
18 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $7,709 |
19 | Seiler Farms Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $7,119 |
20 | Natalie Lenn Brazel | Charleston, MO 63834 | $6,426 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>