Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,544

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $38,338,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$539,234
2Tackett Fish FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$500,000
3Killebrew Cotton CoGreenwood, MS 38935$297,121
4New Hope FarmsSchlater, MS 38952$293,034
5Wright Fish Farms IncInverness, MS 38753$279,510
6Lagniappe Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$273,358
7St Rest Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$252,797
8Nature's Catch LLCClarksdale, MS 38614$250,000
9America's Catch Catfish Farms IncItta Bena, MS 38941$250,000
10Battle Fish NorthTunica, MS 38676$240,834
11Dunn Farms IIItta Bena, MS 38941$218,914
12Passageway FarmsLyon, MS 38645$202,225
13Limerick Farms IITunica, MS 38676$202,213
14Little Omega FarmsTchula, MS 39169$189,487
15Silent Shade Planting CompanyBelzoni, MS 39038$184,701
16Charles Antici FarmsClarksdale, MS 38614$184,471
17Matagorda PlantationsLyon, MS 38645$184,121
18Double B FarmsClarksdale, MS 38614$181,736
19Home Cypress FarmsLyon, MS 38645$181,154
20Bcf-09Tunica, MS 38676$179,783

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag