Biomass Crop Assistance Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 17 of 17
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $2,030,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Woodridge Timber Inc | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $563,184 |
2 | Carolina Pine & Hardwood Inc | Windsor, NC 27983 | $400,106 |
3 | Tim Con Wood Products Inc | Jamesville, NC 27846 | $265,045 |
4 | S&m Timber Products Inc | Sunbury, NC 27979 | $167,483 |
5 | Ayers Forest Products Inc | Williamston, NC 27892 | $144,870 |
6 | Conetoe Land & Timber LLC | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $95,287 |
7 | Boone Logging Company Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $78,199 |
8 | Coastal Plain Timber Co Inc | Williamston, NC 27892 | $74,367 |
9 | Clary Lumber Company | Gaston, NC 27832 | $73,500 |
10 | Winslow - Bateman Forestry Inc | Merry Hill, NC 27957 | $54,242 |
11 | High And High Inc | Vaughan, NC 27586 | $24,768 |
12 | Arcola Lumber Co Inc | Warrenton, NC 27589 | $23,556 |
13 | Seaboard Timber Co Inc | Creswell, NC 27928 | $22,711 |
14 | Hofler Logging Inc | Sunbury, NC 27979 | $17,820 |
15 | Josey Lumber Company Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $15,600 |
16 | Ashton Lewis Lumber Co | Gatesville, NC 27938 | $5,091 |
17 | James E Kerr Timber Co | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $3,866 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”