Counter Cyclical Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,970
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $230,014,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Amd Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $1,709,552 |
2 | Harrell And Owens Farm | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $1,470,136 |
3 | Anderson Farms | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $1,333,604 |
4 | Battleboro Ag Partnership | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $1,296,310 |
5 | Bennett Bros Ptn | Rich Square, NC 27869 | $1,286,569 |
6 | Newsome Farms | Winton, NC 27986 | $1,255,850 |
7 | Umphlett Brothers | Gates, NC 27937 | $1,156,516 |
8 | Dunlow And Dunlow | Gaston, NC 27832 | $1,116,882 |
9 | Stephenson Bros | Garysburg, NC 27831 | $1,065,392 |
10 | Flythe Farms | Seaboard, NC 27876 | $1,065,114 |
11 | W & S Farms | Windsor, NC 27983 | $1,062,930 |
12 | Lane Farms | Gates, NC 27937 | $1,046,098 |
13 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $1,045,640 |
14 | Griffin Farming Partnership | Lewiston, NC 27849 | $1,025,651 |
15 | Pike Brothers | Littleton, NC 27850 | $1,021,610 |
16 | Josey Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $1,018,212 |
17 | Jrk Farms LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $946,986 |
18 | Beasley Partnership | Colerain, NC 27924 | $922,850 |
19 | H & H Farms | Como, NC 27818 | $905,287 |
20 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $878,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>