Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 227
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones) totaled $381,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arthur Farms LLC | New Bern, NC 28562 | $14,515 |
2 | Fulcher Brothers Farm | Ernul, NC 28527 | $13,713 |
3 | Heath Farms | Dover, NC 28526 | $10,944 |
4 | Cynthia J Cox | Richlands, NC 28574 | $10,500 |
5 | Cox & Cox Farms Inc | Richlands, NC 28574 | $10,500 |
6 | Sanderson & Son Farming | Kinston, NC 28501 | $9,910 |
7 | Edgar E Mills & Sons Family Farms | Trenton, NC 28585 | $9,248 |
8 | C Canal Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $8,500 |
9 | Leslie Earl Rouse Sr | Kinston, NC 28501 | $8,398 |
10 | M R Williams II Inc | Kinston, NC 28504 | $8,297 |
11 | Wiggins Farms | Trenton, NC 28585 | $7,754 |
12 | S F Mccotter & Sns Fms Inc | Vandemere, NC 28587 | $7,447 |
13 | Big M Farm | Vandemere, NC 28587 | $7,179 |
14 | Blandina Credle Cahoon | Fairfield, NC 27826 | $7,000 |
15 | L D Rice Farms Inc | Huntersville, NC 28078 | $6,992 |
16 | Lee Jones | Arapahoe, NC 28510 | $6,400 |
17 | Leslie Earl Rouse Jr | Kinston, NC 28501 | $6,370 |
18 | T R C Farms Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $6,076 |
19 | Brown Family Farms Inc | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $5,089 |
20 | Owen Lee Peele | Aurora, NC 27806 | $4,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>