Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,688

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones) totaled $44,819,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Tull Hill Farms IncKinston, NC 28501$750,000
2J C Howard Farms LLCDeep Run, NC 28525$743,750
3W B Bateman & Sons IncElizabeth City, NC 27909$501,124
4Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B AndersVanceboro, NC 28586$410,475
5Fulcher Brothers FarmErnul, NC 28527$368,381
6John E Ferebee Farming IncCamden, NC 27921$359,232
7Meadow PorkJacksonville, NC 28546$260,084
8J B J Kilpatrick Farms IncMagnolia, NC 28453$256,680
9Gregory W ComstockColumbia, NC 27925$250,000
10Tunnell Farms IncSwanquarter, NC 27885$250,000
11Scattered Acres IncBelhaven, NC 27810$250,000
12Faulkner Farms LLCKinston, NC 28501$250,000
13Cottle Farms IncFaison, NC 28341$250,000
14T C Smith Produce Farm IncSeven Springs, NC 28578$250,000
15Lake Ridge Farms LLCFairfield, NC 27826$250,000
16Green Valley FarmsColumbia, NC 27925$247,980
17Alphin Farms LLCLa Grange, NC 28551$247,593
18Anthony C Smith Farms PartnershipPink Hill, NC 28572$246,755
19James E Jr And Wanda H HowardDeep Run, NC 28525$244,929
20Freda RiggsMaysville, NC 28555$225,638

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag