Counter Cyclical Program in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,930
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones) totaled $106,973,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Howard Farms | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $1,282,222 |
2 | James E Jr And Wanda H Howard | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $1,028,175 |
3 | R & W Mccoy Farms | Cove City, NC 28523 | $838,719 |
4 | Spring Branch Farms | New Bern, NC 28562 | $796,581 |
5 | Double H Farm LLC | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $785,149 |
6 | Harvey L & Sally L Rouse | Trenton, NC 28585 | $758,866 |
7 | Sanderson & Son Farming | Kinston, NC 28501 | $691,466 |
8 | Southland Farms | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $655,050 |
9 | Joseph H Ward Farms | Tyner, NC 27980 | $654,298 |
10 | Proctor Farms | Edenton, NC 27932 | $647,236 |
11 | Whaley Partners | Kinston, NC 28504 | $622,380 |
12 | Fulcher Brothers Farm | Ernul, NC 28527 | $590,289 |
13 | Lee Jones & Jones | Arapahoe, NC 28510 | $568,146 |
14 | Goodwin Farming Inc | Tyner, NC 27980 | $562,982 |
15 | Wiggins Farms | Trenton, NC 28585 | $562,510 |
16 | Brown Partners | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $561,098 |
17 | Williams Farm Partnership | Tyner, NC 27980 | $548,893 |
18 | Lynn Hobbs Farms | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $538,977 |
19 | Haddock Farms Partners | Trenton, NC 28585 | $536,082 |
20 | M W Harper Farming | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $523,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>