Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones), 2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,961

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of North Carolina (Rep. Walter Jones) totaled $29,196,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
2021
1Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$415,514
2Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B AndersVanceboro, NC 28586$246,496
3James E Jr And Wanda H HowardDeep Run, NC 28525$212,101
4Agcarolina Farm Credit **Elizabeth City, NC 27906$206,930
5Randy Darren RiggsPollocksville, NC 28573$194,031
6Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$191,048
7Anthony C Smith Farms PartnershipPink Hill, NC 28572$179,929
8Mackilwean Turf Farm IncNew Bern, NC 28560$179,069
9Gordon R IveyMount Olive, NC 28365$178,459
10Layton Farms PartnershipEdenton, NC 27932$177,204
11Fulcher Brothers FarmErnul, NC 28527$172,003
12Scattered Acres IncBelhaven, NC 27810$167,482
13Rodney RiggsPollocksville, NC 28573$166,245
14Faulkner Farms LLCKinston, NC 28501$164,710
15French FarmsVanceboro, NC 28586$160,805
16R & W Mccoy Farms IncCove City, NC 28523$153,736
17W B Bateman & Sons IncElizabeth City, NC 27909$151,895
18Macon Turf Farm IncHertford, NC 27944$149,206
19M W Harper FarmingDeep Run, NC 28525$146,861
20Riggs Brothers Farms PartnershipPollocksville, NC 28573$144,024

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag