Counter Cyclical Program in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,843
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $35,620,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Williamson Farm | Mount Gilead, NC 27306 | $958,633 |
| 2 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $884,931 |
| 3 | Snead Brothers Farm | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $788,844 |
| 4 | Carmichael Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $786,312 |
| 5 | Forbis Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $671,262 |
| 6 | Harvey Z Edge Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $588,508 |
| 7 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $517,090 |
| 8 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $498,285 |
| 9 | J D Carmichael Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $403,201 |
| 10 | Raemon Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $393,050 |
| 11 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $392,544 |
| 12 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $389,463 |
| 13 | Edens & Autry Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $386,528 |
| 14 | Newton Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $386,264 |
| 15 | Johnny H Boyles | Raeford, NC 28376 | $379,179 |
| 16 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $376,399 |
| 17 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $373,385 |
| 18 | J P Locklear Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $371,456 |
| 19 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $367,219 |
| 20 | John M Buie | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $351,225 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf