Loan Deficiency in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,516
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $38,252,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Snead Brothers Farm | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $733,824 |
2 | Hendrix Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $668,120 |
3 | Harvey Z Edge Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $606,697 |
4 | The Williamson Farm | Mount Gilead, NC 27306 | $590,289 |
5 | Juniper Land Co | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $582,812 |
6 | Cecil Sikes Farm Inc | Ansonville, NC 28007 | $543,607 |
7 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $488,213 |
8 | Haynes Stone Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $473,246 |
9 | William Floyd Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $470,934 |
10 | Raemon Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $467,321 |
11 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $455,973 |
12 | Fincher L Martin Martin Farms | Wadesboro, NC 28170 | $423,384 |
13 | Miller Farms Of Rowland Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $411,698 |
14 | Alfordsville Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $369,941 |
15 | Mcdonald Brothers | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $348,071 |
16 | Andrew L Gibson | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $340,063 |
17 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $336,597 |
18 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $335,288 |
19 | Rowland Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $321,022 |
20 | Hayes Brothers Farms | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $319,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>