Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,322

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $21,458,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Todd And Honey Poling JvClayton, NM 88415$494,093
2Armand And Craig Smith PartnershiClovis, NM 88102$477,138
3Pi Diversified IncSpringer, NM 87747$304,580
4Aimbank **Plains, TX 79355$267,507
5F & F Cattle CompanyMosquero, NM 87733$252,841
6Harold MeyersDalhart, TX 79022$250,000
7Shoe L IncMcalister, NM 88427$250,000
8Ti Ranch IncNara Visa, NM 88430$250,000
9Zia Agricultural Consulting LLCAlbuquerque, NM 87107$250,000
10T-4 Cattle Co LLCTucumcari, NM 88401$250,000
11Tee Jay ArnettClayton, NM 88415$234,419
12Bar - T Cattle CoSpringer, NM 87747$234,002
13Harold W SmithLogan, NM 88426$230,697
14Matalina SmithLogan, NM 88426$230,697
15T. E. Mitchell & Son, IncAlbert, NM 87733$230,130
16Robert M QuintanaLas Vegas, NM 87701$227,933
17Mike Oden Cattle Co LLCPrescott, AZ 86305$216,539
18Timothy L MorrowCapulin, NM 88414$214,891
19Whetten Land And Cattle CoNewkirk, NM 88431$207,841
20Barry L Poling CorporationTexline, TX 79087$197,429

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag