Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 89

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Rhode Island (Rep. James Langevin) totaled $2,584,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Sodco IncSlocum, RI 02877$328,629
2Kingston Turf Farms IncWest Kingston, RI 02892$313,920
3Turf IncSlocum, RI 02877$250,000
4Washington County Turf IncWest Kingston, RI 02892$155,812
5Vincent P ConfredaWarwick, RI 02888$131,819
6Jglr IncorporatedExeter, RI 02822$111,320
7Laurel Brook Turf IncWest Kingston, RI 02892$90,888
8A Turf Farm IncHope Valley, RI 02832$70,388
9Margaret E HutchisonSaunderstown, RI 02874$66,898
10Clark Farms IncCharlestown, RI 02813$60,144
11Tartan Farms LLCWest Kingston, RI 02892$52,410
12David W CarpenterWakefield, RI 02879$49,511
13The Greene CompanyGreene, RI 02827$48,600
14Walrus And Carpenter Oysters, LLCProvidence, RI 02909$44,706
15East Beach Farms LLCSouth Kingstown, RI 02879$43,979
16Shellfish For You, LLCWesterly, RI 02891$42,514
17Jeffrey FarrellNarragansett, RI 02882$41,073
18East Beach Oyster Company LLCWakefield, RI 02879$40,612
19Finca Faisan IncDes Moines, IA 50311$40,539
20Pleasant Acres Nursery IncWesterly, RI 02891$40,126

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag