Counter Cyclical Program in 3rd District of South Carolina (Rep. Jeff Duncan), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 3rd District of South Carolina (Rep. Jeff Duncan) totaled $174,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | W Randell Wilson | Abbeville, SC 29620 | $37,625 |
| 2 | Broadacre Farm | Ninety Six, SC 29666 | $21,414 |
| 3 | Major Farms, LLC | Honea Path, SC 29654 | $20,862 |
| 4 | W Harry King | Easley, SC 29640 | $7,012 |
| 5 | Tom W Dunaway III | Anderson, SC 29622 | $4,780 |
| 6 | Floyd M Mcphail | Seneca, SC 29678 | $4,355 |
| 7 | Greenwood Packing Plant | Greenwood, SC 29648 | $4,261 |
| 8 | W A Barnette III | Greenwood, SC 29648 | $3,879 |
| 9 | Sara L Crittendon | Greenwood, SC 29649 | $3,806 |
| 10 | J Denver Powell | Westminster, SC 29693 | $3,422 |
| 11 | James K Edens | Abbeville, SC 29620 | $3,119 |
| 12 | W J Bryan Dorn | Greenwood, SC 29646 | $2,938 |
| 13 | Dotsy LLC | Spartanburg, SC 29302 | $2,845 |
| 14 | James R Robins Sr | Mountain Rest, SC 29664 | $2,614 |
| 15 | Jack L Brock | Iva, SC 29655 | $2,293 |
| 16 | Ruby H Ashley | Greenville, SC 29607 | $2,226 |
| 17 | Greenwood Jersey Farm | Fort Mill, SC 29715 | $2,149 |
| 18 | Hagan Farm % E L Hagan | Due West, SC 29639 | $1,916 |
| 19 | Mendel Stone | Westminster, SC 29693 | $1,740 |
| 20 | Tim Phillips | Honea Path, SC 29654 | $1,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf