Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 293

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $3,138,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
1Michael K ReavesHamer, SC 29547$114,011
2Garner SquiresAynor, SC 29511$110,487
3Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$107,156
4Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$83,621
5Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$80,645
6Glasdrum FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$79,809
7Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$78,717
8Doyle Family LLCAynor, SC 29511$77,221
9Winburn FarmsGalivants Ferry, SC 29544$77,186
10Matthew H BrownConway, SC 29526$73,041
11Drew FarmsMullins, SC 29574$70,986
12Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$60,138
13J Allan Mcdonald FarmsTatum, SC 29594$54,199
14Jason C DoyleGalivants Ferry, SC 29544$53,590
15Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$50,738
16Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$47,404
17Baxley & Baxley FarmsDillon, SC 29536$47,298
18William C Covington JrClio, SC 29525$38,698
19Betty Allen FarmsLatta, SC 29565$38,679
20Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price FarmsDillon, SC 29536$38,464

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag