Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 420

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $12,712,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Ingleside Plantation IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$587,657
2Cloverfield EnterprisesChamplain, VA 22438$516,045
3Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$269,234
4Eagle Tree Farm IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$250,000
5Little Wicomico Oyster Company LlHeathsville, VA 22473$222,133
6Rappahannock River Oysters LLCTopping, VA 23169$199,457
7B & S Farms IncMontross, VA 22520$180,841
8Louis Fairfax ChandlerMontross, VA 22520$176,474
9Herbert Wilkerson & Son IncColonial Beach, VA 22443$172,727
10Harris Farms IncHeathsville, VA 22473$172,146
11Ward Oyster CoWare Neck, VA 23178$169,195
12Robert B Gillions & Son LLCHague, VA 22469$169,049
13Haile Farm LLCDunnsville, VA 22454$163,727
14Mobjack Nurseries IncFoster, VA 23056$158,087
15Welch Farms IncKilmarnock, VA 22482$155,020
16James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$148,973
17Haynie Farms LLCHeathsville, VA 22473$147,600
18Fairview Farms IncKinsale, VA 22488$134,401
19W H Bray & Sons IncorporatedUrbanna, VA 23175$127,439
20Castle Thunder LLCCaret, VA 22436$126,060

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag