Production Flexibility Program in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,755
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $86,591,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,825,767 |
2 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $811,660 |
3 | Penner Farms Joint Venture | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $545,021 |
4 | Ely Ranches | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $521,666 |
5 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $520,062 |
6 | Flerchinger Ranches | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $519,264 |
7 | Double D Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $481,570 |
8 | Kenneth & Debbie Ledgerwood Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $463,415 |
9 | C & S Farms | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $414,455 |
10 | C & L Farms Ptn | Asotin, WA 99402 | $408,038 |
11 | Michael & Alice Gwinn Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $407,550 |
12 | Ferrell & Luvaas | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $393,376 |
13 | Klaveano Brothers Xxx | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $389,840 |
14 | Baker-shelton | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $368,935 |
15 | Payne And Payne | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $353,231 |
16 | Blachly & Sons | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $327,548 |
17 | Ledgerwood Farms Partnership | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $325,974 |
18 | Archer Farm | Dayton, WA 99328 | $320,219 |
19 | Randy James And Terri James Dba James Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $314,460 |
20 | Spokane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $308,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>