Total Commodity Programs in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,105
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 5th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers) totaled $43,630,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spokane Hutterian Brethren Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $1,692,359 |
| 2 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $1,038,538 |
| 3 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $739,333 |
| 4 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $619,703 |
| 5 | Double D Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $424,905 |
| 6 | Emtman Bros Farms Jv | Valleyford, WA 99036 | $407,578 |
| 7 | Seney Land & Livestock Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $380,157 |
| 8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $356,019 |
| 9 | Archer Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $329,180 |
| 10 | Barker Enterprises Joint Venture | Dayton, WA 99328 | $321,612 |
| 11 | T & T Jv | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $312,590 |
| 12 | Dixon Land And Livestock Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $290,436 |
| 13 | Starbuck Ranch LLC | Dayton, WA 99328 | $272,125 |
| 14 | Boulder Creek Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $262,681 |
| 15 | Mead Ranch | Dayton, WA 99328 | $260,428 |
| 16 | Penner Farms Joint Venture | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $258,956 |
| 17 | Klaveano Ranches Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $252,403 |
| 18 | Mark E Medjo | Spokane Valley, WA 99206 | $250,000 |
| 19 | Mark Adams | Spokane, WA 99207 | $250,000 |
| 20 | Randy James And Terri James Dba James Farms | Dayton, WA 99328 | $248,178 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf