Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 383

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Wisconsin (Rep. Bryan Steil) totaled $10,494,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Borzynski Farms IncFranksville, WI 53126$500,000
2Paul Frost Farms LLCWaterford, WI 53185$290,277
3Wilks BrothersUnion Grove, WI 53182$257,926
4Kuiper Family FarmsUnion Grove, WI 53182$251,244
5Michael Borzynski Farms LLCFranksville, WI 53126$250,000
6Noble Grain FarmsBurlington, WI 53105$247,379
7R & C Hawkins FarmsBristol, WI 53104$246,968
8Consolidated Mills Farms IncKansasville, WI 53139$219,657
9Rossi Grain FarmsBristol, WI 53104$210,987
10Mighty Grand Dairy LLCUnion Grove, WI 53182$195,347
11Oak Ridge Sod Farm IncFranksville, WI 53126$187,531
12Gitzlaff Farms IncKenosha, WI 53144$168,764
13Jasperson Sod ServiceFranksville, WI 53126$167,834
14River Valley Ranch LtdBurlington, WI 53105$166,083
15Wind Lake Turf IncUnion Grove, WI 53182$158,533
16Himebauch Farms LlpEast Troy, WI 53120$138,799
17Spoerlein Farm's, LLCUnion Grove, WI 53182$133,087
18Kevin Whitley FarmsSturtevant, WI 53177$126,457
19Debell Dairy LLCSalem, WI 53168$121,409
20Ehrhart Farms IncUnion Grove, WI 53182$120,383

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag