Livestock Subsidies in Michigan totaled $26.5 million from 1995-2017.
Congressional Districts in Michigan Receiving livestock subsidies, 1995-2017
| Rank | District | Livestock Subsidies 1995-2017 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4th District of Michigan (Rep. John Moolenaar) | $6,424,702 | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| 2 | 1st District of Michigan (Rep. Jack Bergman) | $6,284,214 | 23.7% | 48.0% |
| 3 | 10th District of Michigan (Rep. Paul Mitchell) | $3,674,273 | 13.9% | 61.9% |
| 4 | 7th District of Michigan (Rep. Tim Walberg) | $2,593,041 | 9.8% | 71.7% |
| 5 | 3rd District of Michigan (Rep. Justin Amash) | $2,177,115 | 8.2% | 79.9% |
| 6 | 6th District of Michigan (Rep. Fred Upton) | $1,906,535 | 7.2% | 87.2% |
| 7 | 2nd District of Michigan (Rep. Bill Huizenga) | $1,682,626 | 6.4% | 93.5% |
| 8 | 5th District of Michigan (Rep. Dan Kildee) | $958,648 | 3.6% | 97.1% |
| 9 | 8th District of Michigan (Rep. Mike Bishop) | $542,105 | 2.0% | 99.2% |
| 10 | 12th District of Michigan (Rep. Debbie Dingell) | $1,481 | 0.0% | 99.2% |
| 11 | 11th District of Michigan (Rep. Dave Trott) | $836 | 0.0% | 99.2% |
| 12 | 14th District of Michigan (Rep. Brenda Lawrence) | $182 | 0.0% | 99.2% |
NOTE: Not all recipients were able to be placed into Congressional Districts so the District total may not total 100%. Nationally 96% of all program monies were designated into a Congressional District
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Less Farm Pollution, More Clean Water
'Retired' Sensitive Cropland: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow
Growing Organic
Feeding the World
Exposing Fields of Filth
Crop Insurance